ICC’s Pathetic Rana Sanction Exposes Cricket’s Rotten Core

December 3, 2025

The Illusion of Justice is Dead

A Slap on the Wrist, A Kick in the Teeth to Integrity

Let’s be brutally honest about what just happened. The International Cricket Council, the supposed global custodian of the gentleman’s game, looked at Harshit Rana’s on-field antics—the theatrics, the aggression, the send-off directed at Dewald Brevis—and decided the appropriate response was an “official reprimand.” A demerit point. That’s it. This isn’t a punishment; it’s a press release. It’s a carefully worded piece of bureaucratic nothingness designed to create the illusion of oversight while ensuring that a valuable asset, a promising fast bowler being groomed for the high-stakes 2027 World Cup, faces absolutely no meaningful consequences for his actions. Nothing. They might as well have sent him a strongly worded email and called it a day, because the message sent to every aspiring cricketer is crystal clear: the rules are for the little people, not for the cogs in the billion-dollar machine that is modern Indian cricket. This is a farce.

Don’t fall for the smoke and mirrors of Article 2.5 of the ICC Code of Conduct. It’s a shield. A piece of legalese they hide behind while the real game is played in boardrooms, dictated by broadcast rights and sponsorship deals that dwarf the GDP of small nations. Rana’s breach, his aggressive gesticulation towards a batter, is presented as an isolated incident of a young man caught up in the heat of the moment, but it is anything but isolated. It is a symptom of a pervasive, rotting sickness at the heart of the sport, a culture of hyper-aggression nurtured and monetized by the very bodies pretending to police it. They want this drama. They sell it. The broadcasters package it into ‘unmissable moments’ and the boards profit from the manufactured rivalries, so when a player delivers exactly what the product demands, they perform this little ritual of public chastisement, a pantomime of governance that changes absolutely nothing. It is a calculated insult to the intelligence of anyone who still believes in the spirit of cricket. They think we are fools.

The BCCI’s Puppet Show

Why the ICC is a Toothless Tiger

To understand why this ‘sanction’ is so utterly pathetic, you have to understand the grotesque power imbalance in world cricket. The ICC is not an independent governor. It’s a tenant. And its landlord is the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI). The BCCI, with its colossal market and the goldmine that is the Indian Premier League (IPL), effectively holds the ICC hostage. They generate the lion’s share of the revenue, and with that financial clout comes absolute, unchecked power. So when an Indian player, especially a future star like Rana, steps out of line, do you really believe the ICC has the autonomy to hand down a punishment that could jeopardize that player’s availability for a crucial series or tournament? Never.

A reprimand and a single demerit point is the absolute bare minimum they could do to save face. It’s a procedural tick-box exercise. Four of those points in a 24-month period lead to a suspension, a threshold so laughably high for minor offenses that it’s almost never reached by high-value players. This isn’t justice; it’s a loyalty program. The system is rigged to protect the assets of the most powerful board. Think about it. We’ve seen players from smaller nations get hammered for far less, their careers jeopardized over minor infractions because their home boards lack the political capital to fight back. But an Indian player? A player on the fast track for the 2027 World Cup? He gets a quiet word and a note in his file that will be forgotten by next Tuesday. It’s a two-tiered system of justice, one for the powerful and one for everyone else, and the ICC is the willing, complicit enforcer of this corrupt hierarchy.

Breeding Monsters for Profit

The ‘Race for 2027’ is a Bloodsport

That headline, “Harshit takes the first step in fast bowlers’ race for 2027 World Cup,” is more revealing than its author probably intended. It’s a ‘race’. A competition. A high-stakes audition where aggression is currency and intimidation is a key performance indicator. The system isn’t just tolerating this behavior; it is actively selecting for it. The modern game, especially in the T20 format dominated by the IPL, rewards peacocking. It celebrates the ‘send-off’. It lionizes the ‘alpha’ mentality. Coaches and captains preach the gospel of ‘playing hard’ and ‘showing intent,’ which is just sanitized corporate jargon for being an aggressive, unsportsmanlike bully when the camera is on you. Rana is not an anomaly; he is the perfect product of this system. He did what he has been trained to do, what he has been rewarded for doing his entire career in a hyper-competitive environment. He performed.

And now the system must protect its creation. To truly punish him would be to admit that the very culture they’ve cultivated is toxic. It would be an admission that prioritizing marketability over sportsmanship has consequences. They can’t do that. The entire financial structure is built on this foundation of manufactured conflict. So instead, they reprimand him. Publicly, they wag a finger. Privately, you can be sure there are pats on the back. ‘That’s the fire we want to see, son. Just tone it down a bit for the cameras next time.’ This isn’t about correcting a young player’s behavior. It’s about brand management. It’s about ensuring the World Cup-bound product remains polished, aggressive, and, above all, profitable. The soul of the game was sold off long ago. Now we’re just haggling over the price of its rotting corpse.

What about Dewald Brevis? In this whole sordid affair, he’s a footnote. The recipient of the send-off. A prop in Rana’s story. His role was to get out and then stand there and take the abuse, all so the narrative of the ‘fiery Indian pacer’ could be advanced. Does anyone at the ICC care about the message this sends to the other side? The message that you can be treated with contempt on the field and the governing body will do next to nothing to defend the basic tenets of respect that are supposed to underpin the entire sport? Of course not. Because Brevis plays for South Africa, a board with a fraction of the BCCI’s power. His dignity is expendable. The integrity of the contest is secondary. All that matters is that the main characters in this global soap opera are protected. The rest are just extras in a script written in Mumbai and rubber-stamped in Dubai. It’s a disgusting betrayal of what sport is supposed to be about, a complete and total abdication of responsibility from an organization that has become nothing more than a corrupt, bureaucratic shell. A ghost. And we are left to watch the decay.

ICC's Pathetic Rana Sanction Exposes Cricket's Rotten Core

Leave a Comment